Recent
researches have found that, it is not recent, also "is this solving some
problem here?", the question is, no contact, nothing, just
allucinations, we should not deny the optimism from the side of the
'believers', the Rock Planet is the only thing really feasible until
now, something playable, otherwise, remains on combinatorics of the most
boring music style invented.
researches have found that, it is not recent, also "is this solving some
problem here?", the question is, no contact, nothing, just
allucinations, we should not deny the optimism from the side of the
'believers', the Rock Planet is the only thing really feasible until
now, something playable, otherwise, remains on combinatorics of the most
boring music style invented.
Massive Planets
But
let's consider the hyphotesis for "massive planets", Jupiter is nearby,
Discovery have considered "balloons living there" nice drawings btw,
the BBC documentary was more centered on reality, but copying
Kubrik style, that was based on what? A book from the 50's, someone
accidentaly grouped them as a real master, if he try the manouver again
he need to receive the prize of the "perfect ORDER BY", that was bomb
planted, the only person that knows the truth if the librarian of
Kubrick school, "just the librarians know the truth".
let's consider the hyphotesis for "massive planets", Jupiter is nearby,
Discovery have considered "balloons living there" nice drawings btw,
the BBC documentary was more centered on reality, but copying
Kubrik style, that was based on what? A book from the 50's, someone
accidentaly grouped them as a real master, if he try the manouver again
he need to receive the prize of the "perfect ORDER BY", that was bomb
planted, the only person that knows the truth if the librarian of
Kubrick school, "just the librarians know the truth".
This can be a fact
Also,
second point, the rage against the owner, who was behind to promote Brin
and was a bad idea, the same girl that appeared on Reuters, and forgot
that a newwindow parameter is cool. Now the session remains griping the
post on validation queue, weird stuff, watermarks too, on youtube, all
of this is bull shit, just check John Law dilemma, "less is more is not
true", banks were created based first on Gold Reserves, so Wikipedia can
suffer a "huge marketing attack this year, if continues to not validate
their sources", he got the money, made a lot of money spreading lies,
and his "line of work is not correct", all of this remains with the
following, the only good thing about is that "thing don't stop but also
don't move", a problem with the referential, that is not money, but how
the records deal with WEB as the same manner that they have dealed with
radio.
second point, the rage against the owner, who was behind to promote Brin
and was a bad idea, the same girl that appeared on Reuters, and forgot
that a newwindow parameter is cool. Now the session remains griping the
post on validation queue, weird stuff, watermarks too, on youtube, all
of this is bull shit, just check John Law dilemma, "less is more is not
true", banks were created based first on Gold Reserves, so Wikipedia can
suffer a "huge marketing attack this year, if continues to not validate
their sources", he got the money, made a lot of money spreading lies,
and his "line of work is not correct", all of this remains with the
following, the only good thing about is that "thing don't stop but also
don't move", a problem with the referential, that is not money, but how
the records deal with WEB as the same manner that they have dealed with
radio.
DRM
Both
MAPPLE, tried to suggest to the market that DRM and buy on apple store
is good, the user after several weeks throw out the thing, and will
never go to any show of the author, nobody is more worried about such
problems, if they are forgotten better, if a small band can take profit
with shows and get money on WEB even a little still better than all
money went to musicians that were not even author of the music. They are
also wrong labelled as celebrities, you put on same bag, Paris Hilton
(Marketer), Lady Gaga (singer), Actors( Actors), Dancers(Dancers),
Models(Models) if you ask to them, they will prefer to be separated from
each other, desqualify the actor, the singer and the marketer, also
spoilers, what happen with spoilers? well cleary degenerate the
musician, today i just pick a spoiler and cleaned the equalization, that
was wrong, typical for someone listen ozzy and don't like the
music.
MAPPLE, tried to suggest to the market that DRM and buy on apple store
is good, the user after several weeks throw out the thing, and will
never go to any show of the author, nobody is more worried about such
problems, if they are forgotten better, if a small band can take profit
with shows and get money on WEB even a little still better than all
money went to musicians that were not even author of the music. They are
also wrong labelled as celebrities, you put on same bag, Paris Hilton
(Marketer), Lady Gaga (singer), Actors( Actors), Dancers(Dancers),
Models(Models) if you ask to them, they will prefer to be separated from
each other, desqualify the actor, the singer and the marketer, also
spoilers, what happen with spoilers? well cleary degenerate the
musician, today i just pick a spoiler and cleaned the equalization, that
was wrong, typical for someone listen ozzy and don't like the
music.
NDA
The
explanation is simple, Models aren't actors, singers aren't models,
actors aren't marketers, marketers aren't dancers and dancers NDA, the
confusion on "old magazines is just this, you spoonsor magazines that
don't know how to delineate content, put all same bag, went to sale and
nobody ask more nothing", at end you compare a singer with an actor, for
a marketer you transfer the responsability to be something that is not
his/her obligation, "be an example", with all of this, open the door for
stealing on politics, because they are packed on same "label".
explanation is simple, Models aren't actors, singers aren't models,
actors aren't marketers, marketers aren't dancers and dancers NDA, the
confusion on "old magazines is just this, you spoonsor magazines that
don't know how to delineate content, put all same bag, went to sale and
nobody ask more nothing", at end you compare a singer with an actor, for
a marketer you transfer the responsability to be something that is not
his/her obligation, "be an example", with all of this, open the door for
stealing on politics, because they are packed on same "label".
