 |
| Quantum Math |
Depending the context, if you are relaxed and what do you want to write (style), which you want to exercise, idiots can try to pick "statues of somewho", have a name of an apostole that by the way, was very pissed with Raab, Aha, and exercise his toughts of economy, which is good, economy without logic, and evidences at "micro-scale' is bad, at macro scale, are reports, but the evidences on his life were obvious, there is nothing to discute, it is there i have read, also different versions, same problem.
So without learn hebraic neither greek (is it greek?), persons are in hand of "who have readen the evidences", some things like historical archives need to be checked "literally", are historical narratives, historical narratives described like 40 years after some person death, by drunk monks, well it is better you take care. More over if you are a criminal, looking for "4gifs", there are no excuse even more in a place that "well, Death Becomes Her":-). Another amazing movie, phylosophy is shown all time on movies, the manner how do you will interpret depends on "personal experiences", but when you analyse "frame by frame" besides the comedy, came the technicall analysis.
Baker
Also media science is for few, when get "tight by something" that you was not there, and don't want to understand combinatorics neither hiphotesis, neither which is more important bring what you have learn with science actually, you are just another jerk. But was fun, open arms, over the montain, a good name, amazing. This is how "good myths" aka, good speakers are created. Need to be serious, emphasis is essential, as much you avoid such suddenly moves better, such things leads to histeria, histeria leads to "not see the message just the messenger", this is what this guys do a lot, they move all around then you became "motivated with the voice, the speech, but when you pay attention carefully", you check the fallacies.
Home Soap
When you pick the narratives reading without "look at book bla was said this", and read continously you see that the guys were giving a heat on him. As a good guy on logic, he had "ways out for everything", neque palam sapone, he had to always find an answer, but here is the problem, what he said is not law, was a giant scam to fuck him big because nobody got him on rethorics.
