Internet is dead, Kaddafi will remain on power (thanks to ONU), Douglas Crockford took 1 hour of my life just to say, something that is not so obvious. Who is maniputating the Big OBJECT? And why after several releases they want to continue to manipulate the Big Object? I know why, they synchronize the content, few months ago, like 8 months i show like 3-4 times clockwise and anti-clockwise rotation on 'hells portals'.
Like for example on 'google news' how they manipulate the reality? Sad news, really sad, Natte Dog died at 41, that's ok, just bellow another news about 'life insurance'. This is reality manipulation, and why Douglas Crockford took 1hour of my life, because he lied during 1hour. He is really pissed with google not because the project, but because appengine have repackaged his library. THe consequence is that his signature as author of the library have 'vanished' on package deepness.
But who is the guilty for BigObject manipulation, this is easy, "Internet Explorer", they don't accept partial content until version 8, i am not aware if they have fixed on Internet Explorer 9, but the problem is easy to understand, they just show the content when a final http response code arrive. From other problems, such thing have delayed, web release for years, causing millions of deaths. In future, when they open the 'archives for humanity', there is a big chance of Microsoft being compared with 'old SS'. Also look how easy, they want to join content again, which means, join the entire page, because 'i don't know why', inventions, someone invent something, you are on the heat of the day by day, adopt as 'real truth', and never notice, like for example why need doget, dopost, dotrace, dodelete and doput? With the advent of 'real channels', real ajax without pooling, 'inherit context' with sand box, not navigation on top neither hook on BigO.
Why you need this? Someone invented, cookie stealing, all sort of malicious codes, all of this to do nothing, like dont have any value, millions of 'man hour lost' on work that haven't aggregate a minimum on nobody. It is just by the end of the weekend 'someone have something nice to sleep'. I took the BIGO. Also, the security mechanism are almost described on HTML5 specification, sandbox on iframes, embed is the thing joined, 'chrome supports', 'it is html' then is part of the frame like an iframe is just check the code with the search box. And the 'nested' context, somewhere is wrote there, on iframe description.
So on theory, 'google' cannot act like gangsters removing the lateral content, neither jumping from an IFRAME, this is criminal behavior. On Yahoo they don't do such things. Also, look that, i girl spent like 1 year here, and will give tips about Brazil, 1 advice to foreigners, you are not wellcome, doesn't matter your nationality, infect why we are not rigorous on airport, spanking, letting the nude, and calling a dog to snif their asses?
But cookies came from persons that don't know when to expire a session, it is very painfull you enter your password, took too much time, i need 50 toolbars on my browser to be famous on WEB, and during this 2 seconds the only thing that is going fast is money deviated under the eyes of IBM transactions on mainframes. How much money is stealed under IBM eyes? How many millions they have killed too? For example, a good hacker is a dead one, a good IBMer the same.
They are doing a mistake about authorization on OAuth, is not the same thing, it is the inverse, it is not you asking permission to access an application, is an application asking permission to access your data, with this, 'social networks will die', aka, web 2.0. Google don't want to spread the news, but Mark Zuckenberg will be poor very soon. Imagine the following, an use have the right to have 10 good applications to access his data, totally different from Igoogle perpective and applications market place. Same Yahoo, Linked In, twitter.... But except Yahoo, all others are social networks, or to be exact, pooling of persons, an OAuth authorization is the inverse of the authorization mechanism on J2EE, an application ask access to your data, with this, you keep 'safe your data', and let an app took some decisions, like, best day to pay the bills, taxes, with your quota research prices while you sleep, the googler or security used the correct term, 'client-server' applications with server-to-server communications, as never seem in the world.
Also this will lead of a cost 'small' on who want such apps, like, a small 'maintenance fee', several persons urge to have such '4 dollars' apps, to sell to millions, this is the chance, someone 'acquire your war', you install made it run on 'user space' at google, so 'everybody' will have several 'personal wars', instead of midgets wispering death into your eyes and ears, you have persons getting effort to discover something usefull to do with all that knowledge on computing. This is futurism like 'neither' Carl Sagan could thought something like that, every human with several personal wars on this decade, it is really apocaliptic.
I need to register a protest, why Peyton removed the images? Why she is so cruel, what is the gains to be so cruel? Was a nice jump, every day she did the same, have i did something to offend her? I am a very quiet person, it this really need, i was almost clicking a like. :P
