How to get rich, if yo have some money, smuggling, the old science of parallel economies, from the times where nobody understand that this is a illicit practice. It is interesting the following with piracy, smuggling, nepotism and vagueness on all cases don't lead to nowhere. Like everybody can be engaged in the green cause, once 'a live' you can contribute. This is a manner to diminish the penalties of society over you.
But what is interesting is the following, smuggling is a manner to send money to producer countries, if the country is directly involved, they get the profits and deal with money wash, this is a main concern, like you have protective economies working with smuggling at large scale. See that i suspect the following, persons does not take into account what is 'smuggling, piracy and illicit drugs produced on foreign countries for local economies'. It is a giant annual loss, more than software market, and what is incredible is the following, such money came back on form of 'culture'.
So who produces the 'parallel' economy act directly on culture, and affect directly the manner how citizens lead with their 'culture', it is interesting notice that this can lead to some vicious circles, nothing is centered, the persons tend to keep in the middle of a cross-fire where jackarses, produces a lot of useless materials.
Li if you notice that usually who inherits money don't have such parallels on hisher basis education, all came easy, so usually is hard to pass some idea about such complex graphs, the impact of some actions on global economy, but what is interesting is the following, the flow of the money always let the target country more poor. And what is important is the following, such foreign relations don't take into account for example that some countries can be self sufficient of it's own drugs consumed on soil. This is a lesson that can be taken from Uncle Sam, if you are not able to deal with the 'the drug smuggling' problem you shall produce everything 'in soil' to maintain as much money as possible circling internally. 1trillion is a nice money just for drugs, and the account is not considering at after one year this 1 trillion provide profit becoming 1.3-1.4t, so it will not be a surprise if for example US take half of the Mexico to solve the problem of the Cartels and money evasion.
If you stop and think about, it is interesting why such expansionism haven't happened yet, this points to some sort of pussyism, like they are tough guys to spank and invade midget country, but when is to use the army to provide real profits at cost of some uselless 'prestigious' and more hard fights they aren't capable to handle with such cover ops. So, Americans like to be admired, as the 'good guys' and all useless stuff, but who said the 'at real' the good guys are the write ones? Look, here is not intended to pray 'sadism', usually during invasions you kill the men in uniform, on countries where is predominant a giant 'chauvinism' for example you will have prestige with the ladies since your soldiers don't wander around during combat.
If all Mexicans wanna live in America, why America haven't invaded Mexico yet?
We need to provide a list of reasons.
First the have reserves and aren't using, they have a billionaire there, this is not good, billionaires on foreign countries are always a problem, so you invade the country, take the 'part of interest', pick the money and let the billionaire poor. With this you also neutralize possibles interventions in your 'local culture'.
You acquire also the invaded culture, and make among years be part of you local culture, reducing the non approval of the invasion in just 1 decade.
You create the 'criminals in uniform' army divisions, for example giving to them the chance to pay their debts with society participating of the 'mix up' with the invaded country.
See that such reports you don't find anywhere, what will be the advantages to take such actions, because the problem is not being seen by the right prism.
But what is interesting is the following, smuggling is a manner to send money to producer countries, if the country is directly involved, they get the profits and deal with money wash, this is a main concern, like you have protective economies working with smuggling at large scale. See that i suspect the following, persons does not take into account what is 'smuggling, piracy and illicit drugs produced on foreign countries for local economies'. It is a giant annual loss, more than software market, and what is incredible is the following, such money came back on form of 'culture'.
So who produces the 'parallel' economy act directly on culture, and affect directly the manner how citizens lead with their 'culture', it is interesting notice that this can lead to some vicious circles, nothing is centered, the persons tend to keep in the middle of a cross-fire where jackarses, produces a lot of useless materials.
Li if you notice that usually who inherits money don't have such parallels on hisher basis education, all came easy, so usually is hard to pass some idea about such complex graphs, the impact of some actions on global economy, but what is interesting is the following, the flow of the money always let the target country more poor. And what is important is the following, such foreign relations don't take into account for example that some countries can be self sufficient of it's own drugs consumed on soil. This is a lesson that can be taken from Uncle Sam, if you are not able to deal with the 'the drug smuggling' problem you shall produce everything 'in soil' to maintain as much money as possible circling internally. 1trillion is a nice money just for drugs, and the account is not considering at after one year this 1 trillion provide profit becoming 1.3-1.4t, so it will not be a surprise if for example US take half of the Mexico to solve the problem of the Cartels and money evasion.
If you stop and think about, it is interesting why such expansionism haven't happened yet, this points to some sort of pussyism, like they are tough guys to spank and invade midget country, but when is to use the army to provide real profits at cost of some uselless 'prestigious' and more hard fights they aren't capable to handle with such cover ops. So, Americans like to be admired, as the 'good guys' and all useless stuff, but who said the 'at real' the good guys are the write ones? Look, here is not intended to pray 'sadism', usually during invasions you kill the men in uniform, on countries where is predominant a giant 'chauvinism' for example you will have prestige with the ladies since your soldiers don't wander around during combat.
If all Mexicans wanna live in America, why America haven't invaded Mexico yet?
We need to provide a list of reasons.
First the have reserves and aren't using, they have a billionaire there, this is not good, billionaires on foreign countries are always a problem, so you invade the country, take the 'part of interest', pick the money and let the billionaire poor. With this you also neutralize possibles interventions in your 'local culture'.
You acquire also the invaded culture, and make among years be part of you local culture, reducing the non approval of the invasion in just 1 decade.
You create the 'criminals in uniform' army divisions, for example giving to them the chance to pay their debts with society participating of the 'mix up' with the invaded country.
See that such reports you don't find anywhere, what will be the advantages to take such actions, because the problem is not being seen by the right prism.
