 |
Isn't interesting, assertions claim to be well formed, you depart from a central idea, fire an hypothesis based in a new study, then you go like to buzz and depot 2 links, next step is an antagonism, with several parallel assertions but never studies have the 'else', or several 'ifs', such studies never thought like 'us'. The study it self be antagonist providing alternatives, such things they left for the marketing since a study is just a study.
Now think about, stay on chair, for prolonged times is linked with cancer 'what for?', there is no apparent cause, the hypothesis at start is not well clear, like if you remain on chair for a long time, the candies will be near, if it is a home office and you are a smoker, probably you will smoke more, so the chance to develop problems due to sedentary life is obvious higher, but take a look on such prism, there is no way out, you can try to be an sports man, for what? What is the point? Where are you planning to arrive? Talk with people let you happy, are you sure about that?.
But individuals it self are despair, several are just little carcamanos that like to send suggestions or spoilers, like what for? And take a look on the following what you prefer? Is it a right to die doing what you like? Mainly if you know that like 99% of the population are there looking for nothing, and always trying to go on the opposite direction, a cadence of Y/N if you depot a link here, another individual became 'angry', they inflate a little creating antagonism, almost an artificial life. That walk of the shark on water, so it is just a process of business intelligence almost binary, working in a continuous process of 'processing', 'poison and show'. And it is incredible that is quite evident, like I don't have answer for this but I have a related assertion on the negative, with the difference that don't have attraction just repulse or disgusting which point to a management conflict, it is at that time the you should during a 'search' scape for other dimensions, image, video and check if same pattern is occurring, if same pattern occur then the machine was not prepared to establish a correct hypothesis so it is a fail which demonstrate that we are on AC living, several individuals need to be removed from the results, forgotten 'niet', ignomus, ignorant aquitinus all time populating results with boring things, this is also is not a default preference, like who do you never want to see in you life in search results, which sites, another interesting use case, like you have the guys that you don't like but respect, the guys that you like and don't respect (your friends) and the guys that you simply don't want to see in front of you maybe during the life?
The Fifth World War....
