Take a look like why soy milk or soy meal became expensive? Look as an interesting manner to make things expensive for 'us' and cheap for who want to kill 'us', isn't interesting like you model a society that have sympathy for who want to see you dead, but literally, steal your things, your manners, scan your words to see how do you think, just to create such thing called proximity because the real intention is that you prefer them that your 'own people'.
It is always the same talk, 'foreign' relations, but with who? for what? Isolationism is matter of fact provide a broad view of the overall problem, like for example do you know how to define what is corruption?
Corruption is defined as the follow, an act to privilege a class of sort of class before an event really occurs, which means open letters for the competitors price and deliver for the preferable supplier at counter part receive money for such information. Also it is asking for favours like 'let me in' that you give money, where is it that you give more money, that is in counter part interest of who is opening the door or asking 'come here'.
Corruption is also provide information without authorisation, like traffic data with the objective to force some consumption to provide a expected result or conclusion. It like provide assets for relatives to act as suppliers because 'does not will make any difference', such behaviours is noticed as corruption. All of this is know as corruption. It is force a conclusion without first provide an argument, that is because once you felt that you don't understand how really society was organised you fell that you have right to access some data under the wing of the 'justice'.
But let me tell you how justice works, the justice that we have here, this is the justice of the 'presumed elected individuals of a ....' presumed chosen elite. The problem is that 'chosen elite', don't produce just consume. If you just consume you are in the lower chain of responsibility, even that you are delegated just to take decisions, it is the paradigm of the logic against the recursion of the language. You don't have many truths just one truth. And them you elaborate hypothesis in an attempt to justify a 'perspective' that is not defined as true.
Errors occurs, things came out of the control, all of such allegations are just fruit of an anticipated strategy of control, for example lets generate an equilibrium of forces because provides a better understanding of reality, to do this with what you play, correlation, because with correlation you generate more well defined modus operandi of a graph of criminals. If you adopt 2 sides you are the enemy, both sides are criminals then you do what, you anticipate the choice, just to check who will not choose nothing. This is the first that shall be eliminated, heshe don't want to walk. On next steps you eliminate the wrong choices, which that are not defined as a wide open view, the extremist, to at end you reach the equilibrium.
You can call this 'The Guru Principle'.....
