Given a hand to the programmers, the FOAFF LAND.
Let's check some assumptions, plurality and diversity, distinct terms right? First is designate without look on ontology, on many, can be many relationships, many opinions but infect it is being applied over same class or derived classes. Like political plurality, you have such nasty individual that claims to be the owner of the truth, it is just representing some sort of criminal movement, because according with the guru principal, or the omniscient ominous humidus, you are in that moment of truth, and choose just one. "Public Sector" uses such strategies for example to choose the big truth, the inexorable inalienable truth.
Diversity, as the word can be catalogued is just a term that defines a complex set, can be an echo system, a computer system, but it is always something that besides have a big population is heterogeneous, look what define diversity 'hetero-geneous', nothing that someone is intelligent or not, is just a question of 'different characteristics', so, what is the name for illiteracy? It is define on different forms a system and a word is a small system or a particle of an entire system that is the basic idea, when you define or invent new paradigms for the world in the name of 'polite response' you are promoting illiteracy, because on theory, in a dictionary, all knowledge can be defined or with the words or composing a new word joining 2 words to extend the central idea.
And what happens when you spam the graph or 'sense-number' of a word without previous analysis of the impact, you are promoting new 'aggressive inferences' with just the objective to gain time since you already know what is the expected result, an unsuccessful debate. An unsuccessful debate is such political meetings that don't arrive on any intended objective that is just promote large binge and beverage orgy to attempt to gain sympathy.
Also with realtime search, what is fun, you pick such inference engines to pick someone in the blog writing very calm and generate a response, that have an evaluation vector, such evaluation vector is just like an obsolete destroyer, like systems to detect fraud for example, it is stupid, if the problem is in the root, the cancer is inside the egg, which means the central idea, any attempt to use such tools to scan or send an evaluation vector is useless, the principals are different, because the question the central idea is remove a plague from the kernel, such plague to be removed you must remove the individuals that inserted the plague in the kernel, the extermination principle, or 'final solution' for spammer, an spammer is an autobot that is running on a system without previous analysis neither authorisation, for example celebrities text-transforms, generating events without any imagination and also inventing facts that maybe aren't truth, this is low quality marketing, performed mainly by individuals that loss the credibility which means 'entire credibility very fast', because usually they live in a world of fantasy, from the sand to the sandness.
"Well come the programmers".
