 |
Several "problems" found ahead, with such "navigate and search logged" on matter can be nice, among the time, safe "on/off" will not have any difference, unless you get linked with the wrong persons, all of the individuals on G+ are SEO related personnel little soldiers of the evil, that are working for the money on first instance, learned by the books. But the problem is personal information leak from other sources, for example the books that you bought, this is bad, inference engines applied on marketing can be the most pain in the arse mechanism invented by "CS".
And the question of yesterday wasn't answered, as usual someone try to bring up to the table "cold food", as a friend mine said "who like cold food is a whore", pizza mainly, and this is a fact. Besides a good Browser, Chrome behaves like a root kit, with gangs of "we need a like or here is our business", not yours generally speaking you work for "recording companies", obeying orders to induce users to put a like, the thing costs money it is a culture need stimulus, that thing of the drink was "adverted yesterday", it is always the same scam, giant marketing companies with thousand of employees on "social networks", no big deal.
The question that came to my attention if "is it Google asking money to index porn content or index for free the 'assets'", is there any profit to scan porn content, if the answer is not then "they are losing money", need a hand on such issues, maybe i send my CV asking to work with porn companies. There are several opportunities on porn market indeed, it is not yet fully exploited. Also what an comment amazing, the conservative debate is flawn on logic a giant gag indeed, prays to put more porn content on line without "the proper agent behind".
