We shall start to understand that "mute, hypothesis all is designed to determine that". Is it correct you associate always a sequence of segments to a specific action? Sure not, it will just show that "well you have memory", but what for? "Brands", to determine your behavior in a supermarket for example, all that time pumping, "buy this before you die", there are some brands that have, no specific content just brand, and under stress situations "usually a human been answer" like any other human been by instinct.
What is interesting, is the concept of law on such immersed environments, "LAW" is another brand too, 3 chars, can be written on lowercase or uppercase, i saw like 2-3 movies from someone an "actor" that have things related with situations that i have experienced, he collected the hypothesis from some place isn't it? Good for him he need to practice what he like to do, seems to be a good movie "someone can argue" well he is exploiting the image of computer games to promote it self, maybe he is just using a design pattern from kids to parents, look "dad" this is what we do when we play games, this is the situations and characters. Who knows? And what is important, do you like to watch such parallels, guess so, parents want to understand the situation that kids face during "game playing",
Well let's see, the entity on analysis like to act on movies designed to be action movies, defining a sequence of actions that provides a well known context but for curiosity let's see if such parallel is well constructed, for example few moments ago an actor reacted and choose a music "Titãs - Sonifera Ilha" at moment "T", if is considered by a "system" that try to link "well known concepts" like how determined users behaves on "multisensorial media systems", and the actor on question acessing the system is detected to belong on a specific matter and no matter of doubt he sleeps, then the perfect AD at some moment is to remember, you shall buy a new bed.
And what is important? Wellfare or Brands, then change on content you shall believe on something that is just a concept with analogy on common situations taken by day.
For example, the contrasense of GOD, it is just one, not infect, another "brands" are GOD Vishnu, GOD Gatarma, and so on, another brand, that is why probably happened so many bloody wars on past, because brand was not yet a matter of study. Someone with "natural inteligence" noticed that since written is unique, cannot be determined other that no one that points to this brand.
