Thanks to secret agent
Also good journalists, just speak shit, like don't have nothing to write, fill some bytes with nothing, is the social parasite 2.0, see that is very important notice, that "the commando their is also" left to the "mouche", they repeat same shit in cycles, they have a template and a name of an illiteracy to put the credits. Then they substitute 1-2 words, and fill the cover. Weekend there and nothing is better don't read. Pollutes the mind with shit.
Infect the concept is simple, if you are interested on some info, "use the search box", because somewhere is located the correct info. Like i hear about 2-3 different histories about such 500millions, the most plausible is who gave the money was Microsoft. The concept is simple, several agencies don't validate their source, start with a history and end with another history. Because are just copists, the tale of "gossip", once you have a teacher on the announce the thing is trustfull.
Well it is not that the things happen, some months ago someone have shown to me a film with a "history teacher in action", the guy which shown to me was excited about, look "if you have a lesson from this teacher", well what i saw was that the guy was lying. There was no accuracy on the fact described, like best place to follow "stock price is neither google financial, neither reuters", is directly on Nasdaq panels.
Looking to the monster, that is btw a windows application, can real notice that investors are forcing up the price of the share, in 2 years, the gains summed 100%, the cloud effect, persons move the business to some cloud, then start to buy the shares, and to not sell, because now their business is on their hands, but there is a problem with that, regarding data privacy and interest. Since for example, "small business" have a sponsor, that one which "hold the beef", he gains twice, because he monitor the investee and with tips buy the reports at other side.
The risk is obvious, on next investigations if microsoft r ibm force too on legislation of privacy, such share will fall down. Because now they have interest on compete on same services. Last year reuters received money from google to say, "microsoft is not interested in small business platform", is a lie, they are just changing the platform. With this you check that reuters is not a news agency, is a marketing agency. Since investors are not architects they don't have idea on what they talk, if they say "some of this or that", they will believe, their time is short. "Let me hire some 'bloggers' that 'wet the finger' to gamble which direction the wind is blowing". Because the guys forget to program, then forget to look and catalog where to look the correct info, and start to kick all around. This is an important tool, you keep the links, when someone tell a shit, you keep the link mainly if he is using a 'not owned cloud'. This also explains the guy that said, news are fake, news are not fake you are reading someone that wrote what he had listen or read in already 2-3 nuts away. Someone received money to propose this.
Ow great
It seems that now i found a trail of a 'drag-queen', a guy listening to that shit in 2 months became a transformist. I was just thinking on that, for example 'the guy works on television' which means, 8h a day, but he works dressed as a woman, then came to some 'portal of hell' to say 'i am a man', this is not what happen my friend, if you spend 70% of your time dressed like a woman you are 'a wom(eih)m'. Probably this is the 'finesse' of English pop of the 80's, after several months the guy was thinks that be a woman or a man is the same thing. "Go away on such thoughts my friend', go study logic and genetics before say such shit on such times that we know that it is very important we follow some web 2.0 rules, we cannot call them 'fags', cock suckers, since is a 'prostate massage', they are 'lazy dicks', "freako layzd".
