 |
This is Google as "you know it", senate now will call them on duty to explain how all this things happens under state nose, but the thing is quite easy "explainable", U.S. edition means "English Language" edition, "brothers in language", not in culture, still undecided "how they haven't noticed such problems before", the owner origin of the application concept explains, like how many Americans play cricket ? Like delusional actor goes to "some senate commission", to participate in a party, what he doesn't know for example is who "sold" that weapons probably is from his own country, and really don't cares on how it will be used and who is using. Shows an AK for example, but this don't means that a Russian sold it, the explanation is simple, is the attempt of spammers trying to legalize their criminal business. Also the evasion of such central page is explainable the thing is not consumer oriented, but publisher oriented, the consumer have no manners to filter "news feeds", and runs for like "dozens of years" at same manner, "this is information freedom".
Also such web disease has its roots, I was just checking this days a photo from "Huffington Post" with the ex-head of Al-Jazeera, one normal person and 3 schizos on table, by the smile you notice that 3 already are suffering from some "connection less disease ", spike by sadism, such things are true, you don't understand string processing very well and think that is fun how a rank is organized or "it is not intentional", also don't give that women to taliban? Or don't let all that drugs to other cartel, Afghanistan is following same path of Vietnam, to not be worst, a drug ring, reactionary mafias, several "media explorers", like "who authorize someone to pick photos from 'crime scenes' and publish as a news paper on a place that on theory is not designed for that?
It is not a walk on park and "opinions" asking, also the reason why you shall download documents, it is just look on source code, GA spread all around, architectural decisions of specialists, you imagine that a senator for example "knows about such" architectural decisions of public employees during the development of "public websites", like "have a litigation" to decide which is the best "analytic solution" for a public website? Usually they problably don't notify the boss about such problems, "look we will use a solution that is free" but notifies all around with persons "that we never know" who are but notify them about "people accessing our site", like today the big thing for "social graphs" it to analyse even the third generation relatives of a developer to see if you are not mixing with English derived code for example, this is a "good usage", you avoid to mixed up with animals of other orders, it is a freak show but it is real, also for example, "we don't want our copyright images being indexed", but they let it to be indexed otherwise nobody will find it, a lemma from the marketing, and new business models to wash models on Ponzi Schemes, you spend like thousands of dollars to give a bookmark for an audience in an attempt to convince them to spread the word about your site forgetting that "well", take a look when you buy a rigid media, you have bought the rights of reproduction too, what is wrote on the cover is "a fallacy" since they sold the same "information" much cheaper when you buy the entire collection.
Good thoughts on medicine for example, how someone can teach "physiology" without show any visual evidence of "what is trying to prove", or better, sexual preferences of students, because your intelligence for who never studied librarian and indexing techniques is you capacity to "monkeynize some taxonomy" that you ever say in some experiment, a good monkey reproducer thinking that is doing science, remembering here some "comments of students", a guy when saw an old body of an anatomy class, what call his attention is the "penis of the dead body", quite weird, see that for even a simple image of a Nirvana disk, has a valuable tip for hard rockers smart asses from the common wealth, executive education for them. Seems quite "anomalous" but it is just truth, you try to group individuals using fallacy, and trying to find alternatives from information data, to see if someone bite that data, start to like "freak show festival".
